Cacophony Forums

Unofficial Mackie User Forums => DL1608/DL806/DL32R/ProDX Mixers => Topic started by: paulfrench on January 03, 2015, 04:00:30 PM

Title: channel crosstalk
Post by: paulfrench on January 03, 2015, 04:00:30 PM
Anyone else experienced this?: audio signal from one channel is showing up on another meter on the mixer. The level shown on the improper channel is minimal. I'm pretty certain that this is a physical rather than software issue as it happens with adjacent channels on the DL1608. By that I mean audio from keyboard channel 15 "leaks" into vocal channel 5. At first, we thought the mic just needed a shock mount, but later found that this signal crosstalk happens even with the vocal mic unplugged.
Title: Re: channel crosstalk
Post by: Wynnd on January 03, 2015, 10:33:02 PM
Extremely low levels of crosstalk might be normal.  What you seem to be describing doesn't sound normal.  Call Mackie, but you might want to try resetting the mixer first.  If that doesn't work, it might be a bad mixer and need to be replaced.
Title: Re: channel crosstalk
Post by: paulfrench on January 03, 2015, 10:47:54 PM
Thanks for the reply. I just updated to the latest Master Fader, which prompted the firmware update. Would the firmware update have done a reset as you recommended?
I'll have to put some signal through the mixer to test it out tonight.
Title: Re: channel crosstalk
Post by: WK154 on January 03, 2015, 11:26:02 PM
If you can believe the Mackie specs (I don't) on the DL1608 you should not see any signal on the adjacent channel. Crosstalk is rated at <-120 db and the meter scale is stated to be -90 dB (implied dBFSC) at the bottom. That leaves 30 dB before you should see anything. This is measured with the input signal of 1 Khz. Not clear if adjacent channel is shorted (pin2-pin3 on xlr ) or just open. You either have a lot of RF or a defective DL.
Title: Re: channel crosstalk
Post by: RoadRanger on January 03, 2015, 11:33:24 PM
The crosstalk between a used channel and one that has nothing plugged into it can be quite high and this is normal. Having a proper impedance device plugged in lowers the crosstalk from other channels bigtime.
Title: Re: channel crosstalk
Post by: WK154 on January 04, 2015, 12:44:27 AM
The crosstalk between a used channel and one that has nothing plugged into it can be quite high and this is normal. Having a proper impedance device plugged in lowers the crosstalk from other channels bigtime.
I'm well aware of that  hence my question about what's plugged in an of course Mackie doesn't state their test conditions.
Title: Re: channel crosstalk
Post by: paulfrench on January 04, 2015, 01:25:32 AM
So, I've done some tests with a mic plugged in. The signal showing on the unused channel registers from -80 to about -60, and happens on most of the pairs, but not all. Also, the signal is visible, but I can't hear it. I listened with the unused channel soloed, and also muted the plugged in channel (even muted the plugged in channel was passing visible signal to the meters), and turned the plugged in channel down while cranking the unused channel. No sound from the unused channel showing "ghost" signal. Weird. It's showing on the meter, but it's not audible. So, I guess if it can't be heard, it isn't there, right? Maybe this is like the old tale "if a tree falls in the woods......."  or "Currently residing in the WTF file." Hmmm.

Other than this weirdness, the mixer has been really great through 50 gigs this year.
Title: Re: channel crosstalk
Post by: WK154 on January 04, 2015, 05:01:50 AM
Let's approach this another way. You stated that you did about 50 gigs with the DL and it never was noticed before? Or you are now experiencing this recently? Without going into a rigorous test setup what have you found over your years 50 gigs that changed?
Title: Re: channel crosstalk
Post by: paulfrench on January 04, 2015, 05:46:57 AM
Somewhere in the middle of the summer, I noticed this happening during setup. My first thought was that it was the vibrations from the keyboard player hitting his keys and the sound transferring through his vocal mic mounted on the keyboard stand. After unplugging the vocal mic, the meters were still showing low level reaction to his playing. So, I'd say I first noticed this after 20 gigs. Nothing in the setup changed in that time, other than the ideas I tried as possible solutions. ( trying new cables, shock mount for the vocal mic)

Tonight is the first time I've taken the time to explore this further. It's very odd that it shows up on the meters, but can't be heard, at least in the headphone output. I'm next going to try monitoring through the main xlr outs. I didn't have time to set that up tonight.
Title: Re: channel crosstalk
Post by: paulfrench on January 04, 2015, 05:58:22 AM
RoadRanger, I will try again tomorrow using balanced inputs on the adjacent channels and see if that changes anything. Thanks.
Title: Re: channel crosstalk
Post by: Ampli on January 04, 2015, 08:31:45 AM
Sound more that the gain knobs are not turn to minimal (of the channels that aren't in use)
This is also discussed somewhere here in the past
Title: Re: channel crosstalk
Post by: ijpengelly on January 04, 2015, 02:47:01 PM
I've seen this happen before, haven't noticed it as much recently with being able to hide unused channels, as the original posted suggested no actual crosstalk is occurring, just that MF was showing a reading. It wasn't even necessarily on adjacent channels. I think it was / is a quirk in the software. I'll have to see if mine still does it.
Title: Re: channel crosstalk
Post by: WK154 on January 04, 2015, 07:40:04 PM
Been there before but you can't find anything in this mess. So here it is again with the iPad docked and V2.1.1 of MF the readings should be ~-40 on the meter scale when the trim is at 60 dB gain (max) and the input in this case is a 1 Khz signal adjusted to 0 on their input channel meter scale. There is no adjacent channel issue they all respond the same. There is about a 5-7 dB reduction for 100 ohms or 0 ohms compared to being open. To get no visible meter signal  you need to cut gain on adjacent unused channels back to 45-50 dB on the trim pots. If not used reduce gain (trim pot) to 0. If you using 3.01 MF then leave the digital trim at unity. You won't see the digital trim change on the input meter anyways. No quirk in the software AFAIK.
Title: Re: channel crosstalk
Post by: paulfrench on January 05, 2015, 12:04:54 AM
 ijpengelly: I'm Glad to hear someone else has seen this. Yeah, my feeling is the same:some software quirk. As long as nothing audible is happening, I'm not gonna worry about it.

WK154: reducing the gain pots lessened the issue, but I had to go below unity to totally eliminate it.

Thanks for the input guys.
Title: Re: channel crosstalk
Post by: WK154 on January 05, 2015, 06:48:58 AM
ijpengelly: I'm Glad to hear someone else has seen this. Yeah, my feeling is the same:some software quirk. As long as nothing audible is happening, I'm not gonna worry about it.

WK154: reducing the gain pots lessened the issue, but I had to go below unity to totally eliminate it.

Thanks for the input guys.
I don't think you understood so I clarified the previous post. Please re-read. "Go below unity" on what?
Title: Re: channel crosstalk
Post by: paulfrench on January 05, 2015, 02:31:54 PM
on the gain knobs, but I was looking at channel 13 which has markings for high/low z. sorry for the confusion

so, the signal in the unused channel doesn't start to go away until I lower the gain knob to 20db or lower

also, on gigs we are using almost every channel, so instead of calling it the "unused" channel, it's better called "incorrect" channel I suppose
Title: Re: channel crosstalk
Post by: WK154 on January 05, 2015, 04:16:11 PM
on the gain knobs, but I was looking at channel 13 which has markings for high/low z. sorry for the confusion

so, the signal in the unused channel doesn't start to go away until I lower the gain knob to 20db or lower

also, on gigs we are using almost every channel, so instead of calling it the "unused" channel, it's better called "incorrect" channel I suppose
To be sure your input signal is at 0 meter position and  for test purposes nothing is plugged in to all other channels. The adjacent or other channels only go to 20db on their trim knobs before you see meter activity? That means you have 20db of additional noise somewhere in the circuit. Which MF version are you using? V3 has different meter scales. We are just dealing with channel input meters to be sure. On the channel with the input signal make sure you are at 60db of gain if the input signal allows it. We don't want to test the input source just the preamps. A clean source will help.
Title: Re: channel crosstalk
Post by: paulfrench on January 06, 2015, 02:36:28 PM
I'm running the latest MF with the latest firmware update.

I have an old Fostex test tone generator kicking around somewhere, would that qualify as a clean source?
Title: Re: channel crosstalk
Post by: sam.spoons on January 06, 2015, 04:42:32 PM
I'm running the latest MF with the latest firmware update.

I have an old Fostex test tone generator kicking around somewhere, would that qualify as a clean source?

I'm running MF2 on a DL1608, I have noticed this but never tested it, maybe I'll have a look.

I also have a Fostex tone gen and yes I'd say it would qualify.
Title: Re: channel crosstalk
Post by: Greg C. on January 06, 2015, 06:45:36 PM
One thing to bear in mind is that the metering on the DL goes down to below -60dB which is not something you'll find on most analog mixers, so you'll never see crosstalk with those. High res metering is something you find on digital desks these days and you are much more likely to see noise and crosstalk. You're not hearing it because -80 to -60dB is extremely low level. More expensive larger desks will have less crosstalk due to greater physical spacing and possibly better shielding between the preamp circuits. So this is probably a non-problem problem. The easy fix would be for Mackie to change the metering scale to be less sensitive ;)
Title: Re: channel crosstalk
Post by: paulfrench on January 06, 2015, 07:03:59 PM
Well said Greg C.: "non-problem problem".

When a potential bride tells us she didn't book because she and her mother noticed the crosstalk issue, I'll start to be more concerned. That's not happening.
Title: Re: channel crosstalk
Post by: WK154 on January 06, 2015, 07:05:45 PM
Since I don't have MF3 running I can only speak about MF2. Mackie has a habit of messing up meters so until I install MF3 I can't give you values on my mixer. The real estate used to display this is totally out of proportion especially for something that Mackie claims has only 3 points that are valid. Here is the link to MF2 measurements.
http://cacophony.aspinock.com/index.php?topic=636.msg5512#msg5512
They may have changed the meters on MF3. The accurate way to find out what if any significance this has on your sound system is to measure it with a RMS meter and as Greg pointed out may well be below hearing levels. The accepted threshold is -80dBu (in critical listening but not in live sound environments where you're lucky to have a noise floor of 60dB SPL) which of course means  that it's not just a mixer issue but a complete sound system problem. Muting the test signal and listening to the other channels is of course the quickest way I know how to check any relevance to this. Ears do come in handy at times.
Title: Re: channel crosstalk
Post by: Greg C. on January 06, 2015, 07:07:45 PM
Well said Greg C.: "non-problem problem".

When a potential bride tells us she didn't book because she and her mother noticed the crosstalk issue, I'll start to be more concerned. That's not happening.

The metering on my Avid Venue stops at -60dB. That 20dB difference down to -80dB is a substantial amount of added resolution. Quite honestly, it's not good for much except demonstrating the shortcomings of the mixer  :police:
Title: Re: channel crosstalk
Post by: paulfrench on January 06, 2015, 07:15:00 PM
looks like the meters in MF3 go down to -100

i did see meter activity slightly above -40, but it was inaudible even with the headphone at max, and faders at max.
Title: Re: channel crosstalk
Post by: WK154 on January 06, 2015, 08:37:44 PM
This all comes down to the gain structure of all your equipment were the idea is to have all the max's aligned and the noise floor fall's were it may and in live sound it's usually well below your room noise floor. This was mainly to see if your equipment had a fault.