Author Topic: Master Fader V2.0 Wants and Speculation  (Read 126378 times)

sam.spoons

  • Pint #2
  • Master
  • *****
  • Location: Manchester UK
  • Posts: 772
Re: Master Fader V2.0 Wants and Speculation
« Reply #180 on: September 16, 2013, 12:24:30 PM »
The infamous and all enlightening BenO statement about Multitrack recording.

beno (Admin, Mackie) commented  ·  October 31, 2012 3:00 pm  ·  Flag as inappropriate
Unfortunately, this is not possible with the current DL1608 hardware.


There is only one way that's possible and that Mackie implemented V1.1 USB, That's a 1995 issue spec and this mixer was started in 2010 (iPad 4 era). The USB V3.0 was issued in 2008. Talk about state of the art. The V1.1 could only handle 12Mbits on paper thus 17Mbits as required by 16 tracks at 44.1K without overhead would be impossible. There is just one problem with that theory, IT"S NOT HARDWARE!!! This is a digital mixer and after the A/D converter it's software moving numbers around until you send it back to analog via the D/A converter. Sending the data to the iPad won't even be noticed by the Tuna (Blackfin) on a USB 2.0 480Mbits on paper, 250Mbits real world transmission rate. The USB implementation is also not restricted to V1.1. The code is available from Analog Devises for V2.0 etc.. Next, the iOS v4 had usable multitasking implemented which would make multitrack a lot easier. Apple may not have provided more than 2 channel audio recording API's but that's why 3rd party developers and OEM's exist. They write their own code for this like Audiobus. In closing it's quite interesting to note that 16 channel recording has not been rejected in the Mackie feature lists. So do you want to believe a marketing droid that can't tell the difference between hardware and software?

I'm glad to bow to your greater knowledge here WK an it would be wonderful if Mackie did implement multitrack recording with MF and the DL. I'm not going to hold my breath though, even if it's possible I don't believe Mackie have the will to do it  :(

RoadRanger

  • SysGod
  • Counselor
  • Master
  • *****
  • Location: NE CT USA
  • Posts: 1776
  • "Wherever you go, There you are"
    • Cacophony Forums
Re: Master Fader V2.0 Wants and Speculation
« Reply #181 on: September 16, 2013, 12:29:35 PM »
The Behringer and Phonic "clones" announced both do multitrack - Mackie is going to have to do it too or lose the market.

sam.spoons

  • Pint #2
  • Master
  • *****
  • Location: Manchester UK
  • Posts: 772
Re: Master Fader V2.0 Wants and Speculation
« Reply #182 on: September 16, 2013, 12:43:22 PM »
Given Mackie's "we know better than you" attitude these days I'm still not holding my breath >:(

I still like my DL though, warts and all. It does 90% of what I want and 100% of what I really need very well indeed.

Jkowtko

  • Padawan
  • ***
  • Location:
  • Posts: 123
Re: Master Fader V2.0 Wants and Speculation
« Reply #183 on: September 16, 2013, 01:35:03 PM »
As soon as the others get close enough to the DL's price I suspect you will start to see trouble for the DL and Mackie jumping.

Currently the Presonus 16.0.2 is around the $1k mark but it has only 12 mic preamps.

The Behringer X32 rack is selling at FullCompass for $1500 ... get that down to $1000 and I'm sold :)

sam.spoons

  • Pint #2
  • Master
  • *****
  • Location: Manchester UK
  • Posts: 772
Re: Master Fader V2.0 Wants and Speculation
« Reply #184 on: September 16, 2013, 02:05:02 PM »
Mackie will just release a DL1608mk2 with a lightning connector and "different, multitrack capable, hardware" to try to get us all to upgrade  ::)

Jkowtko

  • Padawan
  • ***
  • Location:
  • Posts: 123
Re: Master Fader V2.0 Wants and Speculation
« Reply #185 on: September 16, 2013, 02:56:06 PM »
$1000 is the magic price point for me ...

thedrums

  • Youngling
  • **
  • Location: Third Coast
  • Posts: 23
Re: Master Fader V2.0 Wants and Speculation
« Reply #186 on: September 16, 2013, 05:51:16 PM »
Looks like Mackie is working on a Break Switch option as of today.

RoadRanger

  • SysGod
  • Counselor
  • Master
  • *****
  • Location: NE CT USA
  • Posts: 1776
  • "Wherever you go, There you are"
    • Cacophony Forums
Re: Master Fader V2.0 Wants and Speculation
« Reply #187 on: September 16, 2013, 07:37:40 PM »
From Mackie's FaceBook Page:



Woo! :)

I'll assume this will let me assign the fx to one or two and have my much desired FX mutes available at any scroll position.

Jerrylee

  • Cruise Guy
  • Moderated
  • Knight
  • ****
  • Location:
  • Posts: 345
Re: Master Fader V2.0 Wants and Speculation
« Reply #188 on: September 16, 2013, 11:37:27 PM »
Rr what would this have to do with fx?

RoadRanger

  • SysGod
  • Counselor
  • Master
  • *****
  • Location: NE CT USA
  • Posts: 1776
  • "Wherever you go, There you are"
    • Cacophony Forums
Re: Master Fader V2.0 Wants and Speculation
« Reply #189 on: September 16, 2013, 11:41:51 PM »
Rr what would this have to do with fx?
On the Behringer you can assign the fx to a mute group :) .

Tnelson494

  • Padawan
  • ***
  • Location: Wisconsin
  • Posts: 25
Re: Master Fader V2.0 Wants and Speculation
« Reply #190 on: September 17, 2013, 12:12:50 PM »
That will be cool if it's somewhere on the main page and if you can assign anything to it be good to kill all the Mics in between sets

Jerrylee

  • Cruise Guy
  • Moderated
  • Knight
  • ****
  • Location:
  • Posts: 345
Re: Master Fader V2.0 Wants and Speculation
« Reply #191 on: September 17, 2013, 12:44:08 PM »
Rr what would this have to do with fx?
On the Behringer you can assign the fx to a mute group :) .

Yes, BEHRINGER.

WK154

  • Door #3
  • Master
  • *****
  • Location: Valencia CA
  • Posts: 2643
Re: Master Fader V2.0 Wants and Speculation
« Reply #192 on: September 17, 2013, 05:01:57 PM »
The best you can hope for is that Mackie will make the DL a MFi product such that other apps (Studio 6, Auria, etc.) could use the audio from the DL. The simpler solution would be to make it play with Audiobus. This of course would mean playing nice with other manufacturers software, probably not in their "I'll take all my marbles and go home" plan. A second look at core audio for iOS shows no restrictions on number of audio streams available for recording (within performance limitations) and playback as is demonstrated by apps such as Auria etc..
Jerry got your tracking number yet for the rack or will I beat you to it?
When in doubt KISS

RoadRanger

  • SysGod
  • Counselor
  • Master
  • *****
  • Location: NE CT USA
  • Posts: 1776
  • "Wherever you go, There you are"
    • Cacophony Forums
Re: Master Fader V2.0 Wants and Speculation
« Reply #193 on: September 17, 2013, 05:29:37 PM »
Assuming Mackie gets mute groups right in 2.0 my interest in the X32 Rack will be significantly diminished. I might even commission a custom rack case for the DL1608 this week :) . I've been holding off to see what 2.0 will give us...

Jkowtko

  • Padawan
  • ***
  • Location:
  • Posts: 123
Re: Master Fader V2.0 Wants and Speculation
« Reply #194 on: September 17, 2013, 05:35:07 PM »
Assuming Mackie gets mute groups right in 2.0 my interest in the X32 Rack will be significantly diminished. I might even commission a custom rack case for the DL1608 this week :) . I've been holding off to see what 2.0 will give us...

Mute groups is a decision maker between these two?  Why would you not take the x32 rack?  Price alone? or are there other feature deficiencies when compared to the DL?