I purchased a zed 10fx recently whilst I contemplated jumping in to the digital pond, it's a solid little desk, but I hate the fx, has anyone else found them a bit weird?
Kev
Kev, my ZED10 doesn't have FX, but I have used the ZED10FX model a few times in the past.
I also owned a ZED16FX for 3+ years up until 2 weeks ago when I sold it.
I always found the built in FX on the A&H ZED mixers to be pretty damn good, especially considering the "cheap and cheerful" category these wonderful little mixers fall into.
Most of the ZED's built in FX sound better than what the DL1608 offers.
I've been following your posts for a quite a while, since 25 September last year, and it quickly became obvious that you want as much bang for your buck as possible.
That's ok. I think we all do.
But as far as I'm concerned I'm more than happy to "go with the flow" in regards to built in FX on BUDGET CONSCIOUS audio gear.
My A&H ZED experience has shown me that their built in FX are nicer than the ones in my DL. But not by much.
But I'm happy to live with them considering the current price bracket I'm spending.
For low $ I expect nothing more than "ok" FX.
If you want epically awesome reverbs, delays, choruses, etc, you really need to consider a different level of audio gear.
More expensive probably.
Or if Mackie simply can't provide REALLY GOOD built in FX at any level then you're probably wasting your time here
My guess right now would be that no matter what BUDGET mixer you finally end up buying, be it digital or analogue, will likely fall short of your demanding expectations.
Maybe if Behringer offers fantasmagorical on its cheap as chips, low end mixers then that may be the best way for you to go.
Cheap to buy. Lotsa great features that make you happy and satisfied. No more time wasting, hand wringing, or rocking back and forth.
Just an observation from someone else who "researches the shit" out of everything I buy....but makes a concrete decision in well under 7 months